Category talk:AircraftFrom TinWiki.org What is tinWiki We need to be sure that we are not becoming a wiki-encyclopedia for all subjects like what Wikipedia is. Thank you.
[edit] HoweverI see your point there, but the main reason was not JUST for military aircraft and military aircraft projects. I was also going to have things such as the 9/11 flights, Flight 19, Flight 2501, ect., therefore it shouldn't be just military. Also, if TinWiki is only for conspiracy/paranormal/alternative topics, then why do we have articles on the B1-b, or SR-71, which are not really conspiracy related, paranormal, or otherwise not normal? And I believe the subcategory should be a category, as some of the articles are conspiracy related, such as the Aurora, soon TR3, and the 9/11 flights, ect. --DP 14:40, 2 July 2006 (CDT) [edit] Aircraft CategoryInitially, I agreed with you DP. However, aircraft are not conspiracy related. I dont think its such a bad thing as a sub-category. As for the flights, they will fit in under the 9-11 category or perhaps conspiracy theories, as with TWA Flight 800. The reason there are so many aircraft articles now is that I moved much of the site archives onto the tinwiki. But there are no more to move. William One Sac 22:08, 2 July 2006 (CDT) |
|

