Talk:September 11 2001

From TinWiki.org

This is a discussion page Please finish your message with your signature by typing ~~~~ or by using the signature button in the editing toolbar. Discussion pages are used for discussing the writing and editing of articles. To add a message, click the plus (+) sign tab. To reply, write directly under the post you are replying to, and preferably indent your reply by entering a colon (:) at the beginning of the line. A discussion page is for discussing the article it accompanies, not for discussing the topic described by the article. tinWiki is not a forum, but an encyclopedia. Talk page Policies Tutorial Help

Project 9/11 This article is part of Project 9/11, a project to improve the quality of all articles relating to the attacks on September 11, 2001.

Contents 1 Big one. 2 Anomalies of Flight 93 3 Anomolies 4 Pyroclastic dust 5 [sentence]

Big one.

This page will eventually be the biggest and will likely see "edit wars." Please anyone adding onto this page keep in mind what tinWiki is.
Additions to tinWiki must be factual, with out bias, and of a neutral standpoint.

Thank you

--Umbrax:|Sysop 12:14, 11 June 2006 (CDT)

Anomalies of Flight 93

In this sub-section I think that the last paragraph should be deleted or changed.

Saying "The wreckage field of the plane also seems to point to it falling apart in the air, evidence of a hit by a projectile." seems a little biased to me, if there was a bomb aboard the result would have been the same.

--ArMaP 16:35, 28 August 2006 (CDT)

Anomolies

If you think it needs to be re-worded, then by all means do so. We don't want to appear to be biased, we would like to keep the subjects as neutral as possible. The tinwiki is always a work in progress, so where you see these areas that need improvement, then please by all means make them. Of course use the discussion pages where ever you would like feedback.

--William One Sac 20:19, 28 August 2006 (CDT)

Pyroclastic dust

Right now I saw Sofia Smallstorm's film 911 Mysteries (2006) and for some reason thought the part about "pyroclastic dust" was interesting, not that I know particularly much about September 11. Just briefly doing a "ctrl+f" automatic search for "pyro" in the article here it seemed it's not mentioned. Pyroclastic dust as I understood it is a characteristic type of smoke seen emitting from volcanos, and the dust/smoke on 911 was said to look exactly the same as that. At some later time I might perhaps try and fit some mention of the pyroclastic dust topic into the article somewhere if no one who actually knows something about 911 (which is not the case with me) puts in mention of it first. Optimist 17:25, 6 May 2007 (CDT)

[sentence]

[After getting "informed" from his secretary, something was burn in him but he says nothing.] (What does the previous sentence mean, do you think?)
The above was posted on 10:23, 26 April 2008 by 121.91.23.102 in the article text and moved here