User talk:Ronishia

From TinWiki.org

Contents 1 Welcome to tinWiki 2 Mothman 3 Re: THANK YOU 4 minor edit box 5 thanks 6 No Problem. 7 Chupacabra/El Chupacabra 8 yea 9 Megalodon 10 megalodon 11 Great Job! 12 Rosey entry 13 U2U 14 u2u 15 New World Order 16 Hiya 17 Project Sign and Current events 18 Thanks 19 Re: current events. 20 ATS Relevant Discussion Threads w/ NWO 21 A-12 Link (The one which you removed) 22 Vandals 23 mark this page as patrolled 24 Patrolled 25 Number vandals 26 Patrolled 27 Skull and Bones Image 28 woo hoo skull and bones 29 Your changes to Project Condign

Welcome to tinWiki

Hello Ronishia,
Feel free to copy my talk page if you like. It can make things easier.

• User talk:Umbrax

If you need help with an article be sure to check out the Help page, or you can contact me.

--Umbrax:|Sysop 15:34, 22 May 2006 (CDT)

Mothman

Hi there, I have left a note for you at Talk:Mothman.

Thanks.

--Umbrax:|Sysop 16:41, 22 May 2006 (CDT)

Re: THANK YOU

You’re Welcome. :) Now you can take what you have learned and apply it to the Chupacabra page you have started.

Cheers

--Umbrax:|Sysop 09:15, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

minor edit box

Hi Ronishia,
If you are finding that you need to make several edits when you are working on a page it would be better if you clicked on the Minor Edit Box.
This way when other people look at the Recent Changes page they can "Hide minor edits" to see new pages and major edits.

Thanks.

--Umbrax:|Sysop 16:32, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

thanks

i thought id hit it *sighs* oh well im getting there thanks again hun youv helped me out alot today

--ronishia 16:37, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

No Problem.

Thanks for your contributions.
Chupacabra and Mothman are both major pages that tinWiki has needed.

Cheers.

--Umbrax:|Sysop 16:44, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Chupacabra/El Chupacabra

I just discovered that there was all ready an El Chupacabra page. I did my best to merge your content into the existing page.
You can see the full page here.

Thanks.

--Umbrax:|Sysop 17:02, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

yea

yea i was just looking at that just now, i noticed the other one but didnt know how to merge the to of them, thanks again lol all i seem to do is thank you nowadays haha--ronishia 17:05, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Megalodon

Nice article Ronishia.
You need to work on your "link sections" though. Try clicking on your ATS links and see what happens.
I've fixed your links up on the last couple pages you started. Take a look at those to see the correct way to set up links. See the tutorial on Placing links in a article. Also, please only use your signature on talk pages.

Thanks

--Umbrax:|Sysop 12:42, 24 May 2006 (CDT)

Nice Job on the article, Ronishia.
I ran thru it and sorted it a bit to make it more uniform to the existing articles here.

--Xabora 12:56, 24 May 2006 (CDT)

megalodon

thank you both for helping out im slowly but surly getting the hang of it all now lol now to practice those links grrr lol

thanks both

Great Job!

You are really doing a fantastic job! I realized that I hadn't been awarding you points for your entries, so I did so before. Keep up the good work!

William One Sac 22:35, 19 June 2006 (CDT)

Rosey entry

Wow, that roscicrucian entry is great! Nygdan

U2U

I just checked, I didnt see your u2u. Would you mind resending it? Thanks!

William One Sac 16:22, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

u2u

check your u2u's Ronishia.

William One Sac 18:46, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

New World Order

Hi Ronishia!

I'm Keith! Yes, I certainly am pretty "green." Fortunately, I managed to write the E.B.E. and Black Helicopter articles.

I do want to take you up on offer. I want to co-write the New World Order article and any assistance you could contribute to the effort would be appreciated. My goal is to make the quality and amount of information on the aforementioned article superior to that of Wikipedia's similiary titled piece.

Thanks again for the kind words.

Hiya

Well hiya to you too. Hey, what page do you think you'll be starting on next?

--DP-EBE 17 15:48, 8 July 2006 (CDT)

Project Sign and Current events

Hi Ronishia, I am unsure what the current events are, maybe you could check wikipedia? I remember Umbrax telling me what they were for once, so you could probably ask him. As for Project Sign, I think you did an excellent job. I added a heading further up the page just to make it easier to navigate, and may add some sub-heading later for the samed reason. I think we can also use an article on Captain Mantell, but I know there is some dispute as to who says what he was chasing. (A balloon or a flying saucer)

William One Sac 15:51, 8 July 2006 (CDT)

Thanks

They were made by Adrian Mann. He's made the best known Aurora images available. I was lucky he let me use them on TinWiki! I was also able to get premission for my site, too, so I'm looking forward to finding other places to use them on here!

--DP-EBE 17 15:55, 8 July 2006 (CDT)

Re: current events.

That is just there as default from the mediawiki script.

--Umbrax:|Sysop 16:58, 8 July 2006 (CDT)

ATS Relevant Discussion Threads w/ NWO

I need your help again. I just read on the TinWiki Tutorial that all tinWiki articles need to include links to relevant discussion threads on ATS.

Ronishia, I'm not an ATS member. Could you please locate as many relevant ATS threads to the NWO as possible? If you decide to help me with this task, please don't forget to ask Umbrax for advice.

I will do what I can on my end to find whatever original research and other sources I come across that would be beneficial for the article. I'll need to ask Umbrax for his advice as well.

Thanks

--Keith 19:32, 8 July 2006 (CDT)

A-12 Link (The one which you removed)

I did a quick search on it and it came from Federation of American Scientists.
So it wasn't a porn site that you removed.

--Xabora 17:49, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

Vandals

As of right now there isn't any way to block non-registered users from editing. We must find another way of keeping out the vandals and porn linksters. Sorry, I know this wasn't the solution some of you were hoping for.

William One Sac 15:06, 20 July 2006 (CDT)

mark this page as patrolled

Could you tell me where you've seen this before? I know I have seen it, but I can't find it now! lol

William One Sac 16:38, 21 July 2006 (CDT)

Patrolled

Yeah, I cant find it now either. LOL! I know it's here somewhere!

Number vandals

I have no clue what they are doing. I think it might be something automated that is screwing up. Maybe!

William One Sac 12:02, 23 July 2006 (CDT)

Patrolled

Hey, I just found a link for Mark this as patrolled. It was on a talk page in the text field. I clicked it, and the talk page disappeared and was replaced by "This article has been marked patrolled". So then I went back to the talk page, the link was gone, so I haven't any clue what it's for because it isn't showing up on recent changes page either! :\ William One Sac 10:11, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

Skull and Bones Image

Hi Ronishia,

Your image for the skull and bones has disappeared from the image shack upload. Can you re-upload it or get another image? Thanks.

William One Sac 14:16, 12 August 2006 (CDT)

woo hoo skull and bones

Thanks Ronishia! Thats awesome. I am glad it was just computer problems, some of us were getting worried about ya! --William One Sac 19:28, 3 September 2006 (CDT)

Your changes to Project Condign

Hello Ronishia,

I appreciate that your recent amendments to the "Project Condign" page were well intentioned, but some of them are incorrect.

In the UK, "Defense" is spelled "Defence", so the title of the report is "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region". Likewise, the department that produced the report was the "Ministry of Defence".

I don't understand why you have capitalised "Characteristics" below line 45.

I also don't understand why you have changed "which" to "that" above line 108 - I notice that MSWord often recommends this change, but fail to see the reason for that (which?).

Just above line 115, I think you have made a typo, typing "pares" instead of "Paras".

I also don't understand why you have capitalised "theory" in line 115.

The word "press" below line 115 is intended as a plural, meaning "the newspapers" and in that case, the word "were" is correct and "was" incorrect.

I would have corrected these myself, but we could then be faced with the situation of you making changes, me undoing them, then you making them again.

I would appreciate it if you would revisit your edits and correct them appropriately.

Regards, Joe